THE IMPOSSIBLE COINCIDENCE
SURVEILLANCE SPIKE
February 9-10, 2026
23 users, 11 cities, 7 countries
"Either they're psychic, or they're coordinated."
PROBLEMS WITH THE DISMISSAL
NOT PROPERLY SIGNED
Signed only "Robin MacKay, R.M., Screening Officer" — no official government credentials, no digital signature verification, no letterhead authentication beyond basic logo.
NOT IN EMAIL CHAIN
Sent separately via [email protected], not threaded with original October 15/29, 2025 correspondence. Standard government protocol requires maintaining email chains for audit purposes.
4-MONTH DELAY — WHY NOW?
Filed October 15, 2025. Dismissed February 10, 2026. 117 days later. Why the sudden urgency to respond on the SAME DAY as the surveillance spike?
DISMISSAL REASONS ARE PRETEXTUAL
Claims "no federally appointed judge specified" — but the evidence package clearly documented systematic corruption involving multiple federal courts. The dismissal under 6.7(2)(g) and (h) is a procedural dodge to avoid investigating the substance.
COINCIDES WITH WEBSITE MONITORING
23 users from 11 cities accessed the evidence hub on February 9-10. Moses Lake (Microsoft Azure): 5 users. Toronto: 13 users. Ashburn (AWS): 2 users. They were watching. Then they dismissed.
THE OCTOBER 15, 2025 TRAP
THE SETUP
September 15, 2025
Case R. v. Longo (#21-845) DISMISSED
Crown stated case was "no longer worthy of pursuing"
October 15, 2025, 11:44 PM
EVIDENCE PACKAGE FILED — Exactly 30 days later (last day for appeal)
Sent to multiple Canadian agencies simultaneously
October 15, 2025, 11:30 PM
ALL EMAILS BOUNCED — 14 MINUTES BEFORE SENDING
Coordinated blocking across multiple government agencies
Microsoft/Exchange error codes IDENTICAL across all bounces
THE SMOKING GUN
Emails "bounced" at 11:30 PM
Emails SENT at 11:44 PM
EMAILS CANNOT BOUNCE BEFORE THEY ARE SENT
This proves PREEMPTIVE INTERCEPTION
AGENCIES THAT BLOCKED THE FILING
Attorney General of Canada
BOUNCED
Ontario Court of Justice
BOUNCED
Windsor Police Service
BOUNCED
RCMP
BOUNCED
Canadian Judicial Council
BOUNCED
Manitoba Courts
BOUNCED
ALL BOUNCES HAD IDENTICAL MICROSOFT ERROR CODES
Coordinated at the infrastructure level
THE DISMISSAL LETTER — ANALYZED
WHAT THEY CLAIM
- ✗ "No federally appointed judge specified"
- ✗ "No jurisdiction over Ontario Court of Justice"
- ✗ "Dismissed under 6.7(2)(g) and (h)"
THE TRUTH
- ✓ Evidence package documented SYSTEMATIC corruption
- ✓ Federal courts involved in extradition fraud
- ✓ Dismissal is PROCEDURAL DODGE to avoid substance
CITED: Subsection 86(1) of the Judges Act & Paragraphs 6.7(2)(g) and (h) of Review Procedures (2025)
EVIDENCE EXHIBITS
CJC Dismissal Letter
File 25-1065 — February 10, 2026
AG Bounce October 15
Attorney General email bounces
October 15 Bounces
All agency bounce proof
October 15 Trap Documentation
Complete trap evidence package
ALL PROOF — Complete Bounce Package
11.5 MB — All evidence compiled
FRAUD EMAIL — CJC
Email authentication analysis
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
s. 139(2) CC — OBSTRUCTION
Obstructing justice by blocking legal filings
10 YEARS
s. 465(1) CC — CONSPIRACY
Coordinated blocking across multiple agencies
LIFE
s. 184(1) CC — INTERCEPTION
Unauthorized interception of private communications
5 YEARS
s. 122 CC — BREACH OF TRUST
Public officers using positions for obstruction
5 YEARS
THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"Your Honour, the case was dismissed. Mischief over $5,000. The Crown stated it was 'no longer worthy of pursuing.'
Why did the CJC wait 117 days to respond?
Why respond on the SAME DAY as the surveillance spike?
Why did ALL emails bounce 14 minutes BEFORE they were sent?
What are they so afraid of?"
They watched me. I documented them. Now you're watching it all.