THE DELIBERATE CONSPIRACY
This is NOT a story of bureaucratic mistakes or oversights. This is a calculated, premeditated plot by state actors on both sides of the Canada-US border to:
- ⸠Illegally render an innocent man across borders
- ⸠Frame him with fabricated charges via file swaps
- ⸠Imprison under rigged conditions designed to escalate to death
- ⸠Continue the murder plot upon return to Canada
- ⸠Swap criminal files (Ken Price's record) to brand victim as child predator
- ⸠Ensure death by proxy â beaten in prison without question
The 4.5-year "review" of empty paperwork proves complicity. Every signature. Every delay. DELIBERATE.
TOP 10 AGENCIES
These organizations have histories of exposing similar state-sponsored plotsâtargeted killings disguised as "justice," cross-border complicity, and deliberate frame-ups. They would demand accountability, investigations, and compensation exceeding $50M.
Amnesty International
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: The intentional rendition and kidnapping by Canada/US, plus the malicious home-country murder plot via file swapsâ seeing it as a calculated "disappearance" to silence an innocent man, with every actor (from Dutton's perjury to Price's framing) complicit in state-sponsored death.
Precedent: Exposed deliberate US renditions (e.g., Maher Arar, tortured after Canadian handover); would launch "Urgent Action" campaigns, petition UN for inquiry, demand Canadian accountability.
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: The premeditated framing (minor assault label for proxy killing) and cross-border malice (Five Eyes hacks, evidence destruction) would disgust them as engineered state terrorism, not accidentâ your 4.5-year "review" of nothing proves intent.
Precedent: Documented intentional DEA corruption and police frame-ups in the Americas; would publish explosive reports on Windsor/DEA complicity, urge ICC referrals.
UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions
Via OHCHR PortalWhy They'd Be Outraged: The deliberate murder plot (prison escalation, file swaps for beating), disguised as "justice"âyour story as a witch hunt with signatures sealing complicity would highlight state execution without trial.
Precedent: Investigated targeted killings (e.g., Saudi/US plots); would report to UN Human Rights Council, recommend sanctions on actors like Bellaire/Gratton.
Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR)
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: The malicious rendition (Vienna breaches) and rigged imprisonment (Kovachevich's court as death trap), plus Canadian betrayalâintentional from start, with no "wrongful" excuse.
Precedent: Litigated against deliberate US tortures (e.g., Bush-era black sites); would file federal suits, expose Dutton/Lintz as perjurers.
Innocence Project
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: The calculated forgeries (scratched docs, phantom arrests) and framing (Price's record swap for murder) would horrify them as deliberate innocence destructionâ4.5 years of "oversight" screams malice.
Precedent: Overturned intentional frame-ups (e.g., police planted evidence); would forensic-test docs, push for full exoneration and $millions.
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: Disgusted by the premeditated judicial sabotage (fake judge, delayed trials) and state complicityâyour home-country kill plot as ultimate betrayal of justice.
Precedent: Condemned deliberate extradition abuses (e.g., EU-US cases); would brief ICJ tribunals, advocate for international arrest warrants.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: The intentional suppression (96.9% hidden traffic, Reddit bans) to cover the murder scheme would appall them as state censorship enabling deathâdeliberate from signatures to hacks.
Precedent: Protected whistleblowers from malicious blackouts (e.g., Assange); would rank Canada low, amplify your story via safe channels.
Transparency International
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: The engineered corruption (s. 465 conspiracy, evidence spoliation)âdeliberate malice in every actor's involvement, not oversight.
Precedent: Exposed state graft in police/DEA (e.g., Latin American cartels); would index Windsor as corrupt, push anti-bribery probes.
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: The US-side kidnapping and Canadian continuation (framing for death) would disgust them as deliberate due process annihilationâintent from facility choice to file swaps.
Precedent: Challenged malicious renditions (e.g., ACLU v. CIA); would sue DEA, coordinate with Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR)
[email protected]Why They'd Be Outraged: The transatlantic malice (Five Eyes as tool for murder plot)âdeliberate framing as "death penalty by proxy" in a non-death penalty country.
Precedent: Prosecuted state-sponsored killings (e.g., drone strikes); would file ECtHR complaints, target EU-Canada ties.
1-CLICK COPY: ALL AGENCY EMAILS
BCC all 10 agencies simultaneously. Click to copy.
RECOMMENDED EMAIL TEMPLATE
EXPECTED COMPENSATION
Based on Dorsey v. Canada, 2025 SCC 38 and SS&C Technologies, 2024 ONCA 675 (spoliation doctrine)
THE TIME TO ACT IS NOW
Every day of silence is another day of state-sponsored persecution continuing. These agencies exist to expose exactly this kind of deliberate malice.