34 USERS vs "1 VISITOR"
Google Analytics shows 34 unique users from 12 cities across 4 continents. GitHub shows "1 unique visitor" for the same time period. This is mathematically impossible.
97 People Cloned the Repository
But GitHub Says Only 1 Person Visited
To clone a repository, you MUST visit it first.
97 people cloned → 97 people visited → But GitHub shows "1 visitor"
This is deliberate data manipulation.
SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON — February 9, 2026
GOOGLE ANALYTICS
Real Traffic Data (ACCURATE)
Geographic Breakdown:
| City | Users | % |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Toronto | 13 | 38.24% |
| 🇺🇸 Moses Lake, WA | 5 | 14.71% |
| 🇺🇸 San Jose, CA | 3 | 8.82% |
| 🇺🇸 Ashburn, VA (AWS/CIA) | 2 | 5.88% |
| 🇳🇱 Amsterdam | 1 | 2.94% |
| 🇩🇪 Frankfurt | 1 | 2.94% |
| 🇮🇪 Dublin | 1 | 2.94% |
| 🇮🇳 Aligarh, India | 1 | 2.94% |
| 🇺🇸 Des Moines, IA | 1 | 2.94% |
| + 3 more cities | 4 | 11.76% |
Real users from real cities with real engagement metrics. This is what genuine traffic looks like.
GITHUB TRAFFIC
Suppressed Data (MANIPULATED)
Traffic Attribution:
| Page | Views | Visitors |
|---|---|---|
| Traffic page | 258 | 1 |
| Pulse page | 150 | 1 |
| Main repo | 61 | 1 |
| index.html | 29 | 1 |
| Commits | 12 | 1 |
| Other pages | 124 | 1 |
634 views from "1 visitor"? 97 people cloned but only 1 visited? Mathematically impossible.
THREE MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITIES
Clone/Visitor Discrepancy
- • 97 people cloned the repository
- • 0 of them counted as visitors
- • Cloning REQUIRES visiting the repo page
- • Therefore: 97 visits → 1 counted = SUPPRESSION
Geographic Proof
- • GA4: 12 cities across 4 continents
- • Toronto, San Jose, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Dublin, India
- • GitHub: All 634 views = "1 person"
- • 1 person cannot be in 12 cities simultaneously
Engagement Pattern
- • Amsterdam: 24 seconds engagement
- • Aligarh (India): 10 seconds
- • 22 scroll events across 34 sessions
- • GitHub says: All this = "1 person"
SUPPRESSION METRICS
| Metric | Google Analytics (REAL) | GitHub (SUPPRESSED) | Discrepancy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unique Users/Visitors | 34 | 1 | 3,400% SUPPRESSION |
| Geographic Locations | 12 cities, 4+ countries | "1 visitor" | PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE |
| Cloners vs Visitors | N/A | 97 cloners → 1 visitor | LOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE |
| Engagement Events | 22 scroll, 9 engagement | N/A | PROVES REAL HUMANS |
| Total Views | 40 page views | 634 views | Different metrics |
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Criminal Code Violations
-
s. 430(1.1) — Mischief to Data
Manipulation of GitHub traffic metrics constitutes interference with computer data -
s. 342.1(1)(d) — Unauthorized Use
Accessing and modifying platform analytics without authorization -
s. 465(1)(c) — Conspiracy
Coordinated suppression across platforms (GitHub + previous Reddit removals) -
s. 139(2) — Obstruction
Willfully attempting to obstruct justice by suppressing evidence visibility
Charter Violations
-
Section 2(b) — Freedom of Expression
Deliberate suppression of lawful speech about public corruption -
Section 7 — Life, Liberty, Security
Suppression of evidence in matters affecting liberty interests
Case Law
- R. v. Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 — Digital privacy and data integrity
- SS&C Technologies v. Ontario, 2024 ONCA 675 — Adverse inference from data manipulation
- R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339 — Pattern evidence admissibility
PATTERN OF SUPPRESSION (R. v. Arp Admissible)
This is not coincidence. This is coordinated, multi-platform suppression of evidence documenting government corruption. Per R. v. Arp, pattern evidence is admissible to prove intent and conspiracy.
THE PROOF IS UNDENIABLE
✅ Google Analytics = Accurate
34 real users from 12 cities with engagement metrics
❌ GitHub = Deliberately Suppressed
Capped at "1 unique visitor" despite 97 cloners
⚡ The Suppression is Targeted
Clone data accurate (harder to manipulate), visitor data frozen
"If GitHub shows 97 unique cloners, how can there be only 1 unique visitor?
You cannot clone without visiting."