πŸ”₯ FRANCESCO LONGO

21 Years of Malicious Prosecution

Crown Prosecutor Admits Evidence Destruction on Tape

DAMAGES: $5.13 BILLION

Windsor Police withheld 911 recordings for 4.5 years (spoliation)

Crown Laura Joy: "We shredded it... we fabricated the arrest report"

πŸ“‹ Case Overview

🚨 SYSTEMATIC PERSECUTION: 2005-2026

Francesco Longo has been targeted by Windsor Police, Crown prosecutors, and corrupt defense lawyers for 21 years. This is not a series of mistakesβ€”this is organized criminal conspiracy to destroy an innocent man.

The Pattern

  • 2005: First incident at Windsor Jail - false allegations begin
  • 2019: Tampa, Florida fabrication - arrest warrant backdated
  • 2021 March: Unlawful arrest on fabricated charges
  • 2021-2025: Windsor Police withhold 911 recordings (spoliation of evidence)
  • 2022: Crown prosecutor Laura Joy caught on tape admitting evidence destruction
  • 2023: Defense lawyer Ashley Dale refuses to investigate tampering
  • 2025: Francesco erased from Google search results (digital persecution continues)
  • 2026: LAO refuses legal aid funding against police/Crown

πŸ’‘ THE SYSTEMIC CONNECTION

Francesco's case is not isolated. It connects to the broader Windsor corruption network involving:

  • Judge Paul Howard: Former Crown Attorney, now Regional Senior Judge
  • Shibley Righton LLP: Law firm that appears in Howard's court regularly
  • Norman Groot: Convicted criminal cop (1999) operating as "investigator"
  • Windsor Police: $46M in civil lawsuits for corruption (2020-2025)
  • LAO/LSO: Systematically deny aid/complaints against police/Crown

This is Windsor's "RICO City" - organized corruption where educated officials protect each other.

πŸ“… Complete Timeline (2005-2026)

2005

Windsor Jail - First Incident

Francesco detained at Windsor Jail. False allegations made. Pattern of persecution begins.

Connection: Norman Groot era (1999 conviction β†’ Windsor operations). Judge Howard appointed 2000 (crown network active).

2014

Drew Dilkens Becomes Mayor

Windsor corruption escalates. Police brutality complaints increase 25% over next decade.

Systemic Evidence: Windsor brutality complaints highest in Ontario (40 per 100K at 2024 peak).

2018

Jason Bellaire Becomes Deputy Chief

Use-of-force incidents increase 20% under Bellaire's leadership.

Connection: Judge Jennifer Myers appointed same year (family/criminal dockets overlap with police cases).

2019

Tampa, Florida Fabrication

Francesco travels to Tampa. Arrest warrant created AFTER the fact. Backdated to justify charges.

Evidence: Arrest warrant timestamps prove fraud. Crown coordinated with Windsor Police to fabricate timeline.

2021 March

Unlawful Arrest on Fabricated Charges

Francesco arrested on charges with no legal basis. Arrest report contradicts police statements.

Smoking Gun: Multiple police narratives (5 different versions) prove fabrication.

2021-2025

4.5-Year Spoliation of Evidence

Windsor Police withhold 911 recordings despite court orders. Spoliation = destruction of evidence to hide truth.

Legal Violation: Criminal Code s. 139 (Obstruction of Justice), s. 122 (Breach of Trust by Public Officer).

2022

Laura Joy Caught on Tape

Crown prosecutor Laura Joy admits on recorded call: "We shredded it... we fabricated the arrest report."

Audio Evidence: 11 recordings of Crown, defense lawyers, and judges discussing tampering.

2023

Ashley Dale Refuses to Investigate

Francesco's defense lawyer Ashley Dale refuses to investigate evidence tampering despite audio proof.

Conflict: Defense lawyers in Windsor "won't go against their own" (Crown/police network).

2025

Digital Persecution - Google Erasure

Francesco's name erased from Google search results. Digital evidence of ongoing cover-up.

Pattern: Authorities control information to suppress victims' ability to expose corruption.

2026

LAO Denies Funding - "We Don't Fund Against Police"

Legal Aid Ontario (LAO) representative Alia states explicitly: "We just don't fund against police/Crown."

Systemic Barrier: Victims unrepresented β†’ corruption unchecked. Part of LAO/LSO/Windsor Police cascade.

πŸŽ™οΈ Audio Evidence - Crown & Defense Admissions

πŸ”₯ 11 RECORDED CONFESSIONS

Francesco recorded Crown prosecutors, defense lawyers, and court officials discussing evidence destruction, fabrication, and refusal to investigate. These recordings are smoking gun proof of organized corruption.

πŸ”₯ Recording #1: Laura Joy - "We Shredded It"

Speaker: Laura Joy (Crown Prosecutor)

Date: 2022

Duration: 2:34

Key Snippet Transcript:

[00:23]

Laura Joy: "We shredded it... we shredded the evidence because it didn't fit the narrative. We fabricated the arrest report after the fact."
What This Proves: Crown prosecutor Laura Joy admits to two crimes:
  • Evidence Destruction (s. 139 CCC): Deliberately shredding evidence to hide truth
  • Fabrication of Documents: Creating arrest report after arrest to justify unlawful detention
  • Obstruction of Justice: Manipulating timeline to frame Francesco

Legal Impact: This admission alone justifies dismissal of all charges and civil liability for malicious prosecution ($5.13B damages).

Download Full Recording for Context

πŸ”₯ Recording #2: Ashley Dale - Refusal to Investigate

Speaker: Ashley Dale (Defense Lawyer)

Date: 2023

Duration: 1:45

Key Snippet Transcript:

[01:10]

Ashley Dale: "We won't investigate the tampering. It doesn't matter what evidence you have. We can't go against the Crown."
What This Proves: Defense lawyers in Windsor refuse to defend clients against Crown/police:
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Ashley Dale failed to act in Francesco's best interest
  • "Hand in Hand" Corruption: Lawyers protect Crown/police network instead of clients
  • Systemic Collusion: Confirms pattern where Windsor lawyers "won't go against their own"

LSO Violation: Rules of Professional Conduct 3.2-1 (Quality of Service), 3.4 (Conflicts of Interest).

Download Full Recording

πŸ”₯ Recording #3: Judge Christina Cranes - Malicious Prosecution Discussion

Speaker: Judge Christina Cranes

Date: 2023

Duration: 3:12

Key Snippet Transcript:

[02:15]

Judge Cranes: "This is clearly malicious prosecution. But we can't acknowledge it in court because it would expose the entire system."
What This Proves: Judicial officers are aware of malicious prosecution but protect the system:
  • Judicial Knowledge of Wrongdoing: Judge admits prosecution is malicious
  • Systemic Cover-Up: Refuses to act because it would "expose the entire system"
  • Breach of Public Trust: Judges prioritize protecting officials over justice for victims

Charter Violation: s. 7 (right to life, liberty, security) - Francesco denied fair process to protect corrupt system.

Download Full Recording

πŸ“‚ Additional 8 Recordings

Francesco has 8 more recordings documenting:

  • Crown prosecutors coordinating false testimony
  • Police officers admitting to evidence destruction
  • Court clerks discussing document tampering
  • LSO representatives explaining why they won't investigate
  • LAO officials stating "we don't fund against police"

All recordings available for Supreme Court submission and public release.

View All Evidence β†’

βš–οΈ The Judge Paul Howard Network

πŸ”— HOW FRANCESCO'S CASE CONNECTS TO WINDSOR CORRUPTION

Francesco's persecution is not randomβ€”it's part of a broader network of corruption involving judges, lawyers, police, and insurance companies who protect each other.

Judge J. Paul R. Howard

Appointed: Ontario Superior Court, 2000

Role: Regional Senior Judge, Southwest Region (Windsor/Essex) since 2014

Background: Former Crown Attorney (1980s-1990s), Toronto

Professional Connections:

  • Mary Jo Nolan (Shibley Righton LLP): Senior Partner since 1989, specializes in insurance defense and police liability
  • Shibley Righton LLP: Appears in Howard's court regularly (10+ CanLII decisions 2015-2020)
  • Crown Prosecutors: Former Crown himself; Ministry of Attorney General connections
  • Windsor Police: 15+ decisions on police liability (2018+), pattern of dismissals

How This Affects Francesco:

  • Crown Protection: Howard's Crown background creates bias in cases involving Crown prosecutors (like Laura Joy)
  • Police Accountability: Howard's rulings on police brutality show pattern of protecting officers
  • LAO/LSO Connection: Howard's ties to Ministry of Attorney General link to LAO denials and LSO inaction
  • Insurance Fraud: Howard presided over 10+ insurance fraud cases where Shibley Righton defended insurers

Judge Paul Howard

Former Crown Attorney

Regional Senior Judge

CENTRAL HUB

Crown Prosecutors

Laura Joy (Evidence Destruction)

Ministry of Attorney General

PROTECTED BY HOWARD

Shibley Righton LLP

Mary Jo Nolan (Partner)

Bart Seguin (Lucy's case)

APPEARS IN HOWARD'S COURT

Windsor Police

$46M in lawsuits

Brutality +25% since 2014

PROTECTED BY SYSTEM

Evidence of Network Connections:

Connection Role/Timeline Impact on Francesco Source
Mary Jo Nolan Shibley Partner (1989-Present), Insurance/Police Defense Firm defends police in brutality cases; appeared in Howard's court LSO Member Directory
Shibley Righton 10+ cases before Howard (2015-2020) Professional protection network enables lawyer misconduct CanLII Court Decisions
Crown Network Howard's ex-Crown background (1980s-1990s) Bias protects Laura Joy despite audio confession Ministry of Attorney General
Police Brutality 15+ Howard rulings on police liability (2018+) Pattern of dismissals enables Windsor Police corruption SIU Ontario Reports
LAO/LSO Barriers Ministry ties link to funding denials Francesco denied aid; LSO won't investigate Laura Joy Legal Aid Ontario

πŸ’° Damages Calculation - $5.13 Billion

βš–οΈ COMPREHENSIVE DAMAGES CLAIM

Francesco seeks $5.13 billion in damages for 21 years of persecution, including loss of freedom, reputation, family, career, and psychological trauma. This amount reflects the severity of organized corruption and deters future misconduct.

Damage Category Amount (CAD) Justification
Malicious Prosecution $500,000,000 21 years of false charges, wrongful arrests, fabricated evidence
Spoliation of Evidence $1,000,000,000 4.5-year withholding of 911 recordings prevented fair defense
Charter Violations (s. 7, 9, 11) $2,000,000,000 Denial of life, liberty, security; arbitrary detention; unfair trial
Loss of Reputation $300,000,000 Google erasure, digital persecution, public defamation
Psychological Trauma $500,000,000 PTSD, anxiety, depression from 21 years of persecution
Loss of Family/Relationships $200,000,000 Destroyed family bonds, alienation from loved ones
Loss of Career/Income $300,000,000 Unable to work due to persecution; lost 21 years of earning potential
Punitive Damages $330,000,000 Deter future corruption; punish egregious conduct by officials
TOTAL DAMAGES $5,130,000,000 $5.13 BILLION CAD

Legal Precedents Supporting High Damages:

  • R. v. Jordan (2016 SCC): Unreasonable delays violate Charter s. 11(b); justifies dismissal and damages
  • Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Police (2007 SCC): Malicious prosecution by police = civil liability; damages awarded
  • Nelles v. Ontario (1989 SCC): Crown prosecutors can be sued for malicious prosecution if abuse of process proven
  • McDougall v. Black & Decker (2008 ONCA): Spoliation of evidence = presumption against spoliator; enhanced damages
  • Vancouver (City) v. Ward (2010 SCC): Charter violations justify damages even without tort claim

Francesco's case exceeds all precedents due to 21-year duration, audio proof of Crown/police crimes, and systemic obstruction.

πŸ“’ Take Action

HELP EXPOSE WINDSOR CORRUPTION

Francesco's case is not just about one manβ€”it's about ending systemic corruption that dishonors all Canadian citizens. You can help.

πŸ’° DONATE - Fund Legal Fight πŸ“‚ View All Evidence πŸ“Š Read Systemic Studies
← Back to Windsor Trifecta Homepage