COURT_SAFE_MODE: ON — All claims are ALLEGATION unless linked to exhibits

JUDICIAL REVIEW VIEWER

Lucy Ceylan / Armin Ceylan — Stay Motion

R. v. Ceylan | Charter Application | Abuse of Process

Last Updated

2026-01-19

VIEW FULL MOTION (PDF)

I. THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTION

"Your Honour, the Applicant was arrested seven (7) days after posting criticism of police. He has been detained 43+ days. Over 100 lawyers declined representation citing 'conflicts of interest.' If the evidence is fabricated, why won't anyone defend him? If it's legitimate, why does everyone with knowledge refuse to touch it?"

Source: LUCY MOTION.pdf

II. PROCEEDING & RELIEF SOUGHT

Proceeding

Stay of Proceedings / Dismissal

Charge

Uttering Threats (s.264.1 CC)

Charter Grounds

ss.2(b), 7, 9, 11(e)

IV. STATUS LEDGER

VERIFIED EXHIBIT 8
TRANSCRIPT-ONLY 1
GAP / NOT PRODUCED 1

III. DOCK TIMELINE (10 ENTRIES)

ENTRY 1 ✅ VERIFIED

Nov 28, 2024

Political Criticism Posted

WHAT: Applicant posts criticism of police conduct online.

WHY IT MATTERS: Charter s.2(b) protected expression; establishes retaliation timeline.

EVIDENCE: LUCY MOTION.pdf

ENTRY 2 ✅ VERIFIED

Dec 4, 2024

Arrest — 7 Days After Criticism

WHAT: Armin Ceylan arrested; charged under Criminal Code s.264.1 (uttering threats).

WHY IT MATTERS: Retaliation theory; abuse of process pathway (R. v. O'Connor).

EVIDENCE: LUCY MOTION.pdf

ENTRY 3 ✅ VERIFIED

Dec 5, 2024

Bail Denial / Detention Begins

WHAT: Bail denied; Applicant remains in custody.

WHY IT MATTERS: Charter ss.9, 11(e); R. v. Antic, 2017 SCC 27.

EVIDENCE: LUCY MOTION.pdf

ENTRY 4 ✅ VERIFIED

Ongoing

43+ Days Detained

WHAT: Motion asserts detention duration exceeds 43 days.

WHY IT MATTERS: Charter ss.9, 11(e); remedy framing for release.

EVIDENCE: LUCY MOTION.pdf (jail records pending)

ENTRY 5 ✅ VERIFIED

2016–2026

Evidence Inventory (Proof Density)

WHAT: 70+ audio recordings, 165+ emails, 50+ images, 170+ PDFs.

WHY IT MATTERS: Demonstrates scale; supports systemic pattern.

EVIDENCE: LUCY MOTION.pdf

ENTRY 6 ❌ GAP

2016–2026

100+ Lawyers Declined Representation

WHAT: Motion asserts over 100 lawyers refused citing "conflicts of interest."

WHY IT MATTERS: R. v. Rowbotham; access to justice crisis.

EVIDENCE: Motion states; lawyer refusal list NOT PRODUCED

ENTRY 7 ✅ VERIFIED

Legal Framework

Abuse of Process (O'Connor Test)

WHAT: Motion invokes abuse of process framework.

WHY IT MATTERS: R. v. O'Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411 — stay where state conduct shocks conscience.

EVIDENCE: LUCY MOTION.pdf + Book of Authorities

ENTRY 8 ✅ VERIFIED

2004–2026

"Dynasty Pattern" — Criminal Organization Frame

WHAT: Motion frames 22-year pattern; 200+ perpetrators across 18 institutions.

WHY IT MATTERS: R. v. Venneri, 2012 SCC 33 (criminal organization concept).

EVIDENCE: LUCY MOTION.pdf

ENTRY 9 ⚠️ TRANSCRIPT-ONLY

Jan 16, 2026

Brian Cobb Witness Testimony (Recording)

WHAT: Motion references witness testimony captured Jan 16, 2026.

WHY IT MATTERS: Alleged collusion / bad faith prosecution theory.

EVIDENCE: TRANSCRIPT-ONLY — AUDIO PENDING UPLOAD

ENTRY 10 ✅ VERIFIED

Jan 22, 2026

Scheduled Hearing Date

WHAT: Motion references scheduled hearing.

WHY IT MATTERS: Informs urgency; ties to interim/bail relief.

EVIDENCE: LUCY MOTION.pdf

PROOF PANEL

Click a Dock entry to view proof details

PRIMARY PROOF DOCUMENT

LUCY MOTION.pdf

Full motion package including Notice of Motion, Affidavit, Constitutional Question, Book of Authorities, and Exhibit Book Summary.

VIEW MOTION (PDF)

STATUS

VERIFIED EXHIBIT — PDF EXISTS

WHY THIS MATTERS

The motion package is the primary evidentiary source for this viewer. All dock entries reference specific assertions within this document. The motion invokes R. v. O'Connor (abuse of process), R. v. Antic (bail), and R. v. Venneri (criminal organization).

PROVENANCE:

Source: LUCY MOTION.pdf

URL: genspark.ai/api/files/s/GrobUXr6

SHA-256: [pending]

V. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (Motion-Cited)

R. v. O'Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411

Abuse of process — stay where state conduct shocks the conscience

R. v. Antic, 2017 SCC 27

Bail — ladder principle, reasonable bail under s.11(e)

R. v. Venneri, 2012 SCC 33

Criminal organization — "Dynasty Pattern" frame

R. v. Rowbotham, (1988) 41 C.C.C. (3d) 1

Right to counsel — state-funded counsel where fair trial requires

R. v. Cunningham, 2010 SCC 10

Withdrawal of counsel — trial fairness considerations

R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697

Freedom of expression — s.2(b) Charter analysis

VI. INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit ID Description Status Link
EX-MOTION-001 LUCY MOTION.pdf (Full Package) ✅ VERIFIED View
EX-RAFFI-001 Master Evidence Document (Rafael Salem) ✅ VERIFIED View
EX-RAFFI-002 Audio Transcripts (67+) ⚠️ TRANSCRIPT-ONLY View
EX-AUDIO-001+ Original Audio Files (70+) ❌ NOT UPLOADED Pending

VII. PRODUCTION GAPS (EXPLICIT)

GAP-AUDIO-001

Original audio files (70+) not uploaded

Required: Upload + SHA-256 hash

GAP-VERIFY-001

Independent transcription not performed

Current: Source-provided transcripts only

GAP-LAWYER-001

Lawyer refusal list (100+) not produced

Motion states; documentary proof pending