Two GitHub Accounts Systematically Suppressed
⏰ DEADLINE
Original Account
SUPPRESSION DETAILS:
Second Account
SUPPRESSION DETAILS:
Active Account — TRAFFIC SUPPRESSED
97
Cloners
1
"Visitors"
634
Views
NOT DISABLED — BUT ACTIVELY SUPPRESSED
Account remains active but traffic statistics are being manipulated. 97 unique cloners but only "1 visitor" reported. Mathematical impossibility documented in SUPPRESSION_EVIDENCE.html.
ACCOUNT #1: flongo11
Original evidence repository created and populated with documentation
→ STATUS: DISABLED
ACCOUNT #2: rvlongo-case
Second account created after first disabled. Same suppression methodology applied.
→ STATUS: INACCESSIBLE
ACCOUNT #3: opusmax422-dot
Current active account. Not disabled but traffic actively suppressed.
→ STATUS: SUPPRESSED (97 cloners = 1 visitor)
EVIDENCE HUB: GensparkSpace
Alternative hosting established. Google Analytics confirms real traffic.
→ STATUS: ACTIVE — 34 unique users from 12 cities
URL: nxffhryi.gensparkspace.com
R. v. Arp [1998] 3 SCR 339
"Evidence of similar acts on other occasions is admissible to establish a pattern, system, or modus operandi."
APPLICATION:
Three accounts. Same target. Same methodology. Same result. This establishes a pattern of deliberate suppression.
SS&C Technologies v. Ontario [2024] ONCA 675
"When evidence is intentionally destroyed or suppressed, the court must draw an adverse inference."
APPLICATION:
Disabling accounts containing evidence = suppression. Adverse inference must be drawn against suppressors.
s. 430(1.1)
Mischief (Data)
s. 342.1
Unauthorized Computer Use
s. 139(2)
Obstruction of Justice
s. 465(1)
Conspiracy