Executive Summary
WHAT HAPPENED
GitHub SUSPENDED the account flongo11 on December 10, 2025, claiming "harassment" and "offensive language." However, NO specific evidence was ever provided despite repeated requests. The repository contained court-ready documentation of the Francesco Longo case — 455 smoking guns exposing judicial corruption.
KEY DATES
AFFECTED URLs
- github.com/flongo11 → 404
- github.com/flongo11/rvlongo-case → 404
- flongo11.github.io/rvlongo-case → 404
SUPPORT TICKET
Ticket #135161 — Status: AUTO-REPLY ONLY
Visual Evidence
"This is not the web page you are looking for"
GitHub Octocat 404 Page
Captured: Feb 15, 2026 at 7:36:45 AM
URL: https://github.com/flongo11
"There isn't a GitHub Pages site here"
Repository Inaccessible
Captured: Feb 15, 2026 at 7:33:31 AM
URL: https://github.com/flongo11/rvlongo-case
Why This Proves Deliberate Suppression
ENTIRE ACCOUNT GONE
Not just a repository — the entire flongo11 user profile returns 404. This requires administrative action at GitHub's level.
NO WARNING
No email notification, no warning, no appeal process communicated. Silent deletion indicates coordinated action, not policy enforcement.
SUSPICIOUS TIMING
Account deleted while evidence case was gaining traction (33,000+ views on main hub). Correlates with other suppression patterns.
Key Legal Point
GitHub is owned by Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft has contracts with:
- U.S. Department of Justice
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security
- FBI and other law enforcement agencies
- Five Eyes intelligence alliance
This creates a direct chain of command from U.S. agencies to platform-level content suppression.
Suppression Timeline — UPDATED WITH EMAIL EVIDENCE
github.com/flongo11/rvlongo-case hosted 391 KB of evidence documentation
GitHub sent email claiming account violated policies due to "harassing other members with offensive language"
NO SPECIFIC EVIDENCE PROVIDED. NO EXAMPLES GIVEN.
User demanded evidence under s. 7 Charter (R. v. Stinchcombe disclosure requirements)
User attempted to resolve access issues — received only auto-reply
Feb 14-15, 2026 — User merged branches to publish full evidence
February 15, 2026 at 7:36 AM — Both profile and repository return 404
GitHub REFUSES to reinstate despite no evidence of violations.
🚨 GITHUB EMAIL EVIDENCE — PROOF OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS
GitHub's Unsubstantiated Claims:
From: GitHub Support <[email protected]>
Date: December 10, 2025
Subject: RE: GitHub account suspension
"Following reports received and subsequent investigation, your account was found to be in violation of GitHub's Terms of Service. Specifically, harassing other members with offensive language is prohibited and, based on the nature and volume of prohibited activity on your account, we will not be reinstating your account at this time."
WHAT GITHUB CLAIMS
- • "Harassing other members"
- • "Offensive language"
- • "Nature and volume of prohibited activity"
WHAT GITHUB CANNOT PROVE
- • NO specific statements cited
- • NO screenshots provided
- • NO timestamps given
- • NO complainant identities revealed
LEGAL STANDARD: R. v. Stinchcombe [1991] 3 SCR 326
Under s. 7 Charter, fundamental justice requires full disclosure of evidence used against an accused. GitHub's refusal to provide specific examples of alleged violations is itself a violation of procedural fairness.
If they had evidence, they would show it. Their refusal proves they have NONE.
Critical Questions GitHub MUST Answer
1. WHO FILED THE REPORTS?
- • Names/emails of complainants
- • Evidence they provided
- • Dates/times of complaints
- • Any government affiliation?
2. WHAT SPECIFIC LANGUAGE?
- • Exact quotes from comments
- • Timestamps of violations
- • Context of statements
- • Why is truth-telling "harassment"?
3. WHICH 7 OFFICIALS REVIEWED?
- • Names and titles
- • Review dates
- • Communications with external parties
- • Who authorized suspension?
4. "CLONE BROWSER" EVIDENCE?
- • Technical logs of routing
- • IP addresses involved
- • Authorization chain
- • Evidence of tampering
Criminal Code Violations — If GitHub Acted on False Reports
Pattern: Multi-Platform Suppression
GitHub deletion is part of a documented pattern of coordinated suppression across platforms:
Active Evidence Mirrors
Despite GitHub suppression, evidence remains accessible:
Legal Notice
This document presents factual observations of GitHub account status as of the documented timestamp. Screenshots and evidence were captured for legal documentation purposes. All statements regarding platform behavior are based on observable technical evidence. The purpose of this documentation is to preserve evidence for potential legal proceedings regarding coordinated suppression of legitimate content.