ATTEMPTED MURDER BY PROXY VIA FRAMING
8
Contradictions
LIFE
Maximum Penalty
573
Death Code
0
Escape Paths
Eight disclosure contradictions prove a coordinated criminal conspiracy to frame the Applicant for sexual assault on an indigenous minor, with transfer to Nunavut constituting attempted murder by proxy.
Document Date: February 1, 2026 | Status: HABEAS CORPUS EXHIBIT | Classification: SMOKING GUN
"Your Honour, the disclosure identifies the Applicant via driver's license photo — implying no criminal record. Then the charge documents use a mug shot — implying criminal history. Where did the mug shot come from? The only answer: FABRICATION. The narrative was created to frame an innocent man."
This document presents eight (8) irrefutable disclosure contradictions that prove a coordinated criminal conspiracy under s. 465(1)(c) Criminal Code. The evidence establishes:
s. 465(1)(c) CCC — Conspiracy (life imprisonment)
R. v. Venneri, 2012 SCC 33: structured groups facilitating offences
s. 239 CCC — Attempted murder (life imprisonment)
R. v. Ancio, [1984] 1 SCR 225: intent proven via preparatory acts
s. 137 CCC — Fabrication of evidence (14 years)
R. v. Cuerrier, [1998] 2 SCR 371: deceptive narrative causing deprivation
s. 122 CCC — Breach of trust (5 years)
R. v. Boulanger, 2006 SCC 32: public officer fraud
INITIAL DISCLOSURE
Identification via driver's license photo
→ Implies: NO criminal record
CHARGE DOCUMENTS
Identification via mug shot
→ Implies: Criminal history exists
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Impossible without fabricated mug shot. Constitutes s. 137 CCC fabrication of evidence (14 years). Consciousness of guilt: narrative created to worsen perception.
EARLY DISCLOSURE
No victims listed
Bratton (Gratton #19407) statement: no family/Steven Haley mentioned
CHARGE CREATION
Two victims added: Haley + Steve
For mischief >$5,000 — restitution-eligible
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Victims inserted for restitution scam (s. 738 CCC). No damage documented, no photos of "undamaged backyard." Constitutes s. 380 CCC fraud (14 years).
Photographs were entered into evidence but have disappeared.
Contents: Photographs of "undamaged backyard" — proving NO mischief occurred.
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Per SS&C Technologies Canada Corp. v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corp., 2024 ONCA 675, para. 45: destruction of evidence mandates adverse inference. Court must presume photos proved innocence.
AG Vulnerable Victims Head • Signing Authority
Framed for mischief → Sexual assault → Death
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Haley emailing Alana Best (with signing power over victim payments) proves coordinated scam. Constitutes s. 122 CCC breach of trust by public officer (5 years).
THE SCHEME:
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Constitutes s. 239 CCC attempted murder (life imprisonment). Per R. v. Ancio, [1984] 1 SCR 225: intent proven through preparatory acts. Framing innocent man for sexual assault on indigenous minor = intent to cause death.
INTENDED RECIPIENT:
Ken Price
ACTUAL RECIPIENT:
Applicant (by mistake)
CONTENT:
Indigenous language rights
CODE:
"573" — Death sentence
DATE INSTRUCTION:
"October 23rd don't miss"
POST-DATE ACTIVITY:
Multiple cop buzzes (arrest attempt)
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
The misdirected paper constitutes DIRECT EVIDENCE OF MENS REA — the perpetrators' own documentation of intent to cause death via prison transfer. Per R. v. Ancio: intent proven through preparatory acts. This document alone proves the assassination plot.
BEFORE OCT 23
Zero police visits
No contact, no investigation
AFTER OCT 23
Multiple buzzes
Arrest attempt for Nunavut transfer
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
The timing proves coordination: missed scheduled date → immediate arrest attempt. Constitutes s. 239 CCC attempted murder with consciousness of guilt (urgency after missed target date).
SEPTEMBER 2025
Applicant's name listed for sexual assault/gun charges
No sentences yet recorded
POST-EXPOSURE
Applicant's name disappears
Ronaldo Lago inserted instead
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Timing (after 4th of July trap exposure) proves ongoing narrative creation. Perpetrators saw exposure → altered records. Constitutes s. 430.1 CCC data mischief (10 years). Per R. v. Tse, 2012 SCC 16: electronic record tampering.
The phone call log provides direct corroboration of the October 23rd plot. Pattern analysis:
BEFORE OCTOBER 23RD
ZERO
Police/intercom buzzes
AFTER OCTOBER 23RD
4+ INTERCOM
Within 48 hours (Oct 31, Nov 2)
CALL LOG PATTERN (Screenshot Evidence):
LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE:
The timing proves coordination: misdirected paper said "October 23rd don't miss" → Applicant did not appear → immediate intercom clustering began. Per R. v. Khan, 1990 SCC: cumulative circumstantial evidence establishes intent. Constitutes s. 423 CCC intimidation (14 years) with aggravating consciousness of guilt.
| If Respondents Claim... | Then They Admit... |
|---|---|
| "Standard identification procedure" | Why two different methods? Consciousness of guilt |
| "Victims were always listed" | Contradicted by initial disclosure — fabrication |
| "Photos were never entered" | Then why are they referenced? Spoliation |
| "Alana Best connection is coincidental" | AG head + signing power + Haley email = pattern |
| "Paper was correctly delivered" | Then why indigenous rights for non-indigenous? Plot exposed |
| "Post-October 23rd visits were routine" | No prior visits + specific date = arrest attempt |
| "Ronaldo Lago insertion is unrelated" | Timing (after exposure) + name swap = ongoing tampering |
| Remain silent | ADMISSION OF GUILT |
NO ESCAPE PATH EXISTS
Every explanation leads to guilt. The evidence is irrefutable.
| # | Contradiction | Violation | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ID Method (License → Mug Shot) | s. 137 CCC Fabrication | 14 years |
| 2 | No Victims → Two Victims | s. 380 CCC Fraud | 14 years |
| 3 | Missing Photographs | Spoliation — SS&C | Adverse inference |
| 4 | Restitution Link (Alana Best) | s. 122 CCC Breach of Trust | 5 years |
| 5 | Sexual Assault Framing | s. 239 CCC Attempted Murder | LIFE |
| 6 | Misdirected Paper (Ken Price) | s. 131 CCC Perjury + s. 239 | LIFE |
| 7 | Post-Oct 23 Cop Visits | s. 239 CCC Attempted Murder | LIFE |
| 8 | Ronaldo Lago Insertion | s. 430.1 CCC Data Mischief | 10 years |
| AGGREGATE — s. 465(1)(c) Conspiracy | R. v. Venneri, 2012 SCC 33 | LIFE | |
"Your Honour, the disclosure evolved from no victims to two victims. The identification changed from driver's license to mug shot. Photographs proving innocence disappeared. A paper meant for Ken Price was delivered to the Applicant by mistake — revealing an assassination plot via Nunavut transfer. How does the Crown explain any of this?
The only answer that fits the evidence is FABRICATION at the highest levels."