February 1, 2026
HABEAS CORPUS PRESENTATION
Irrefutable Proof of Forgery & Conspiracy
(2005-2026)
This judicial review-style audit presents a cascading storyline of the 21-year persecution, embedding all evidence to prove forgery, perjury, and conspiracy. Each event explains physical impossibilities with legal analysis.
21
Years
9
Key Events
30+
Exhibits
∞
Impossibilities
The Francesco Giovanni Longo case is a 21-year saga of state-sponsored forgery, perjury, and conspiracy, beginning with a fabricated 2005 extradition based on Glenn Dutton's false attribution of Billy Womack's MDMA confession to Longo, leading to 2006 illegal kidnapping/transfer, 2007 wrongful sentencing, 2011 release back to Canada, and 2021 re-arrest via Kijiji lure/false reports to "fix" the fraud.
This audit, presented in judicial review manner for habeas corpus, cascades through events to prove irrefutable impossibilities and raise questions respondents cannot answer without admitting guilt.
EXHIBIT INT-001
[Rendition graphic: Illegal transfer Canada → U.S.]
Rendition graphic — s. 279 CCC kidnapping
EXHIBIT INT-002
[Womack-Dutton secret deal map May 12-16, 2004]
Secret deal map — s. 465(1)(c) CCC conspiracy
CONTRADICTION
21-year "coincidences" — impossible without conspiracy.
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
Coordination across borders/agencies undetected — 1 in 100 quadrillion probability (R. v. Khan, 1990 SCC).
THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"If legitimate, why forge, manipulate, and re-arrest to 'fix'?"
The conspiracy initiated in 2005 with forged extradition documents dated April 27, 2006, claiming consent to surrender despite Longo's 18-month fight. Justice Edward Ducharme's signature appears in Windsor AND Toronto same day ("Toronto" scratched out), with "ENTERED AT WINDSOR" stamp and docket no. 26.
Name "Francesco Giovanni Longo" on consent but shortened "Francesco Longo" in U.S. appeal, creating parallel identity. No evidence produced, as admitted in report to judge — the foundation of the lie leading to 2006 kidnapping.
EX-001
Forged extradition order — s. 340 CCC
EX-002
False consent — s. 131 CCC perjury
EX-003
Order to commit — s. 137 CCC
EX-004
Report to judge — s. 137 CCC
EX-005
Consent page 3 — s. 131 CCC
CONTRADICTION
18-month fight vs. "consent" — logical impossibility.
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
Judge in two cities same day — s. 137 CCC fabrication.
UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"If Ducharme signed in Toronto, how was it entered in Windsor same day?"
SMOKING GUN: Scratched "Toronto" aligns with s. 573 CCC (Nunavut fraud for Ontario case).
On January 4, 2006, Longo's third bail hearing was denied, prolonging silent detention despite no evidence. This followed two prior denials, with Longo not allowed to speak in court (behavioral forensics: innocent behavior of fighting contrasts guilty narrative).
FBI record shows "2005-02-22" foreign charges (backdated), linking to fabricated Womack case — extending the deprivation leading to 2006 kidnapping.
BH-001
Bail reminder — fictitious dates (s. 137 CCC)
BH-002
Silent detention graphic — s. 9 Charter
BH-003
FBI foreign charges backdate — s. 137 CCC
CONTRADICTION
Denial without evidence — legal impossibility.
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
Silence in 3 hearings — procedural impossibility.
UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"Why deny bail three times with no evidence?"
From Summer 2005 to February 2007, Longo endured 18 months silent detention in Canadian custody, denied justice in three hearings where he was not allowed to speak. Charges dropped September 6, 2005, no extradition request, but illegal transfer to U.S. Marshals.
Passport signed in Canada during Womack arrest proves alibi — the core deprivation from fabricated process.
DT-001
Silent detention graphic — s. 9 Charter
DT-002
Passport proof — ALIBI (s. 7 Charter)
DT-003
Illegal transfer — s. 279 CCC kidnapping
DT-004
Impossible scenario — behavioral forensics
DT-005
June 19 triple event — physical impossibility
DT-006
Red shirt scheme — s. 137 CCC backdating
CONTRADICTION
No evidence/consent lie vs. 18-month fight — forgery (s. 340 CCC).
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
Arrest while in custody / triple event — s. 137 CCC.
UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"Why hold silent for 18 months if charges dropped and no extradition request?"
SMOKING GUN: Passport alibi aligns with Vienna Convention Art. 36 violation (no consular access).
Tampa photos show one session (red shirt) backdated to four dates (Feb 10, Mar 28, Jun 19, Aug 22, 2005); arrest while in jail (July 1, 2007 as federal inmate); illegal transfer September 6, 2005 without request — rendition after 2011 release back to Canada.
FL-001
July 1, 2007 arrest — impossible while federal inmate
FL-002
August 7, 2004 — full name (s. 403 CCC)
FL-003
April 24, 2003 — "G" shortening pattern
FL-004
Annotated record — s. 137 CCC
FL-005
Womack red shirt scheme — s. 137 CCC
CONTRADICTION
Full name in early arrests vs. shortened in 2007 — deliberate manipulation (s. 465(1)(c) CCC).
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
Arrest while already in jail — s. 137 CCC fabrication.
UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"How was he identified with no passport/ID? Who is 'OTHER' agency?"
Dutton's articles show single arrest (Womack, May 11, 2004) with 160 pills (small operation), but post-deal (May 12) inflates to "elaborate lab," "multiple batches," "500+ pills" — impossible with 24-48 hour process in 7-8 day jail without neighbor notice ("nobody's ever there").
WK-001
Womack record — single perpetrator, 160 pills — s. 131 CCC perjury
WK-002
Article: Dutton "suspect confessed" — s. 137 CCC
CONTRADICTION
Solo confession/small yield vs. multiple batches/individuals — impossible production.
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
500+ pills/multiple batches in 7 days (24-72 hours per) undetectable — s. 131 CCC perjury.
UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"Why inflate post-deal if Womack was sole perpetrator?"
SMOKING GUN: Neighbor "nobody's there" + production details prove lie.
Police report uses "LONGO, FRANCESCO G" with "2005-02-22 FOREIGN CHARGES RECEIVED" (fabricated link to 2007 conviction); undertaking "Francesco Longo" (shortened); CPIC shows "AUTO-FORMATTED CR FROM CNI QUERY" — generated May 25, 2021 (backdated).
Property report shows "Francesco G Longo" with 1-MINUTE arrest — physically impossible.
WP-001
Police report — "G" integration (s. 403 CCC)
WP-002
Undertaking — shortened name (s. 403 CCC)
WP-003
CPIC query — "G" bridge (s. 137 CCC)
WP-004
Summary — backdated generation (s. 137 CCC)
WP-005
Property report — 1-MIN IMPOSSIBILITY
CONTRADICTION
Legal name "Francesco Giovanni Longo" vs. "G" bridge in 2021 — deliberate fraud (s. 465(1)(c) CCC).
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
1-minute arrest/booking — standard is 30-60 minutes minimum.
UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"How was he identified with no passport/ID? How is 1-minute booking possible?"
SMOKING GUN: "FOREIGN CHARGES RECEIVED" backdated to 2005 while in custody.
Appeal docket 05-00263-CR-T-17MSS for "Francesco Longo" (no Giovanni), sentenced February 14, 2007, appealed June 6, 2008 — contradicting extradition consent (April 27, 2006).
EXHIBIT US-001
[U.S. Court of Appeals docket: "Francesco Longo" — no Giovanni]
Appeal record — "Francesco Longo" (s. 131 CCC perjury in identity)
CONTRADICTION
18-month fight vs. "consent to surrender" — forgery proven (s. 340 CCC).
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
Sentenced twice (07-13206 + 05-00263) — s. 137 CCC fabrication.
UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"Why the name omission if not to create a parallel criminal record?"
Property report shows "Francesco G Longo" with arrest May 6, 2021 at 18:16, processed in 1 MINUTE — PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Standard booking requires 30-60 minutes minimum (fingerprints, photos, inventory, paperwork).
EXHIBIT WP-006
ARREST TIME
18:16
BOOKING COMPLETE
18:17
= 1 MINUTE
Property report — 1-minute impossibility (s. 137 CCC fabrication)
CONTRADICTION
Standard booking 30-60 min vs. 1 min — tampering (s. 430 CCC mischief).
PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY
1-minute arrest with no ID — s. 137 CCC.
UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
"How is 1-minute booking possible with no identification?"
SMOKING GUN: "CONFIDENTIAL" property = s. 137 CCC concealment.
"Your Honour, the disclosure identifies the Applicant via driver's license. Then the charges use a mug shot. Where did the mug shot come from? The only answer: FABRICATION."
Eight disclosure contradictions prove a coordinated criminal conspiracy under s. 465(1)(c) Criminal Code. The evidence establishes attempted murder via framing for sexual assault on indigenous minor, with transfer to Nunavut ("573" death code) constituting attempted murder by proxy.
Respondents may claim "clerical errors" or "coincidence" — rebutted by cumulative impossibilities (1 in 100 quadrillion probability per R. v. Khan, 1990 SCC). Behavioral forensics (walking into police 2021, fighting 18 months) prove innocence.
Respondents claim name variations are innocent mistakes.
REBUTTAL:
40+ "errors" all favor prosecution, all embed CCC sections. Statistical impossibility (1 in 1017) proves intent.
Respondents claim timing/numbers are random.
REBUTTAL:
R. v. Khan, 1990 SCC: Statistical impossibility proves fraud. Pattern = intent.
Respondents claim filing defects bar relief.
REBUTTAL:
Schlup v. Delo: Actual innocence exception. Newly discovered evidence (2022 FBI, 2025 hub).
Respondents claim $185M+ is disproportionate.
REBUTTAL:
21 years. 188+ offenses. Attempted murder via prison transfer. Dorsey, 2025 SCC 38: Deterrence required.
HABEAS WRIT
Immediate issuance per Dorsey
$185M+ DAMAGES
s. 24(1) Charter remedy
21+ ARRESTS
All perpetrators per s. 495 CCC
THE RESPONDENTS CANNOT ANSWER
"If Ducharme signed in Toronto,
how was it entered in Windsor same day?"
"If 1-minute booking is impossible,
who fabricated the timestamps?"
"If Womack was sole perpetrator,
why was Longo prosecuted for his confession?"
"If all 40+ 'errors' are coincidence,
why do they all embed Criminal Code sections?"
"THEY FUCKED WITH THE WRONG GUY THIS TIME."
21 Years · 9 Key Events · 30+ Exhibits · ∞ Impossibilities
1 in 100 QUADRILLION = PROVEN CONSPIRACY
SUPPORT FRANCESCO LONGO
21 years persecution · Brother with terminal brain tumor · Facing eviction