WHY THEY BELIEVED THEY'D NEVER BE CAUGHT
"No one signed the disclosures. Highly educated lawyers, prosecutors, and judges knowingly broke the law. Why? Because they believed Francesco Longo would be DEAD."
Dead men don't file motions. Dead men don't press charges.
0
Signatures
21
Years of Crimes
50+
Identified Actors
ALIVE
The Victim
Document Date: February 1, 2026 | Status: HABEAS CORPUS EXHIBIT | Classification: SMOKING GUN
"Your Honour, why would highly educated lawyers, prosecutors, and judges — people who KNOW the law — deliberately and systematically violate it?
Why would no one sign any disclosure documents?
Because they believed the victim would be DEAD, and the dead don't press charges."
The Strategy: Leave all disclosure documents unsigned. Distribute responsibility across the entire group.
THE LOGIC:
"You can't charge everybody. And if no one signed, you can't charge one person."
Per R. v. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 SCR 326: Crown is obligated to provide signed, verifiable disclosure.
The Strategy: Frame the victim for sexual assault on an indigenous minor. Transfer to Nunavut. "573" death code.
THE LOGIC:
"Dead men don't file motions. Dead men don't press charges. If the victim dies, we're safe."
Per R. v. Ancio, [1984] 1 SCR 225: Intent to cause death via proxy = attempted murder.
Francesco Longo SURVIVED.
Now he has 21 years of evidence.
And they have 21 years of liability.
| Strategy | What They Expected | What Actually Happened |
|---|---|---|
| No Signatures | Can't identify individual perpetrator | Pattern proves CONSPIRACY — all identified by registry # |
| Distributed Guilt | "Can't charge everybody" | s. 465(1)(c) CCC — CAN charge entire conspiracy |
| Victim Death | No complainant = no charges | VICTIM ALIVE — filing motions NOW |
| System Protects System | Judges never charged | Evidence PUBLIC — system exposed |
| Educated Violators | "Know how to evade" | Knowledge = AGGRAVATING factor |
Each actor is identified by registry number. Despite leaving no signatures, the pattern identifies them all:
Officer • Unsigned disclosure
Believed: "Can't prove who wrote it"
Registry • "Scrub" admission
Believed: "Victim will be dead"
Prosecutor • Anonymous charges
Believed: "Distributed responsibility"
Deputy • Payout control
Believed: "System protects system"
Chief • Oversight failure
Believed: "Chiefs never charged"
Registry • Pattern participation
Believed: "Just following orders"
Registry • Pattern participation
Believed: "Can't charge everyone"
Judge • Two-city forgery
Believed: "Judges never charged"
Agent • False attribution
Believed: "Cross-border immunity"
50+ actors identified — each thought the group would protect them.
Per R. v. Briscoe, 2010 SCC 13: Group participation = individual liability.
s. 465(1)(c) CCC — Conspiracy
Conspiracy to commit indictable offence = life imprisonment. Per R. v. Venneri, 2012 SCC 33: ALL members of structured group can be charged.
s. 21 CCC — Parties to Offence
Everyone who aids, abets, or participates = liable as principal. Per R. v. Briscoe, 2010 SCC 13: Knowing participation = guilt.
s. 463 CCC — Accessory After Fact
Assisting after offence = 14 years. Per R. v. Hibbert, [1995] 2 SCR 973: Continued participation = continued liability.
| Violation | Section | Penalty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obstruction of Justice | s. 139 CCC | 10 years | Anonymous disclosures |
| Breach of Trust | s. 122 CCC | 5 years | Public officers violating duty |
| Conspiracy | s. 465(1)(c) CCC | LIFE | Coordinated impunity strategy |
| Attempted Murder | s. 239 CCC | LIFE | Death-by-proxy expectation |
| Aiding Offence | s. 21 CCC | As principal | Group participation |
| If Respondents Claim... | Then They Admit... |
|---|---|
| "Unsigned documents are standard practice" | Show the policy — none exists; Stinchcombe requires signed disclosure |
| "We didn't know the victim would die" | Then why the Nunavut/573 framing? — consciousness of death plot |
| "I was just following orders" | R. v. Finta, [1994] 1 SCR 701: Not a defense for educated professionals |
| "My participation was minimal" | s. 21 CCC: Any participation = full liability |
| "I didn't know it was illegal" | Lawyers, judges, prosecutors — knowledge is PRESUMED and AGGRAVATING |
| Remain silent | ADMISSION OF GUILT — impunity doctrine exposed |
THE IMPUNITY DOCTRINE HAS FAILED
The victim is ALIVE. The actors are IDENTIFIED. The evidence is PUBLIC.
"Your Honour, highly educated lawyers, prosecutors, and judges knowingly violated the law. They left no signatures on any disclosure documents. They framed an innocent man for sexual assault on an indigenous minor to send him to die in Nunavut.
They believed they would never be caught because the victim would be DEAD.
HE'S NOT DEAD.
Now 21 years of crimes are exposed. Now 50+ actors are identified. Now the impunity doctrine FAILS."